Dave's reading notes

corey-the-expanse

Properties1
tagsbook-fiction, expanse, fiction, james-corey, science-fiction

Corey: The Expanse

Summary: James S. A. Corey’s nine-book science fiction series — humanity spread across the solar system, class conflict between Earth, Mars, and the Belt, first contact, and the long question of what cooperation costs. The Expanse generates unusually precise observations about cognition, narrative, war, and human nature.

Sources: Clippings/Corey-Babylons-Ashes.md · Clippings/Corey-Tiamats-Wrath.md · Clippings/Corey-Cibola-Burn.md

Source pages: Babylon’s Ashes, Cibola Burn, Tiamat’s Wrath

Last updated: 2026-05-05

The Pleistocene primate

“It was what came of being a primate with a body built for the Pleistocene savanna. Fear and relief and lust and joy were all packed into the same little network of nerves somewhere deep in his amygdalae, and sometimes they touched.” (source: Clippings/Corey-Babylons-Ashes.md)

The most precise literary restatement of Sapolsky’s core argument: we are running ancient hardware in a new environment, and the amygdala does not cleanly separate emotional categories — fear and joy share architecture. “Sometimes they touched” is a novelist’s description of the mixed activation that the neuroscience documents. See dual-process-cognition and sapolsky-behave.

Stories, not facts

“I thought if you told people facts, they’d draw their conclusions, and because the facts were true, the conclusions mostly would be too. But we don’t run on facts. We run on stories about things. About people.” (source: Clippings/Corey-Babylons-Ashes.md)

“We’re not people. We’re the stories that people tell each other about us.” (source: Clippings/Corey-Babylons-Ashes.md)

The first quote restates WYSIATI from inside the disappointment — someone who believed in facts discovering they don’t govern belief. The second extends it to identity: persons are narratives constructed by others, not stable essences. See narrative-bias and identity.

History as retrospective inevitability

“History, Michio believed, was a long series of surprises that seemed inevitable in retrospect.” (source: Clippings/Corey-Babylons-Ashes.md)

The hinge of chaos-and-prediction: the universe generates novelty that resists forecasting, but narrative-bias smooths the surprises into a story of causes. After the fact, everything seems like it had to happen.

The psychological flip side — what happens when you can’t impose a story:

“Conspiracy theories come up whenever people feel like the universe is too random.” (source: Clippings/Corey-Cibola-Burn.md)

Where chaos-and-prediction describes the limits of simulation, this names the emotional response: randomness is intolerable, so a malevolent agent is substituted for chaos. See political-manipulation.

Nature vs. nurture as false choice

“The problem, of course, with the idea of nature versus nurture was that it posed a choice between determinisms.” (source: Clippings/Corey-Babylons-Ashes.md)

Sapolsky’s position in a sentence. Neither genes nor environment alone determine outcomes; each is a modifier of the other across timescales from evolutionary to developmental to situational. See genes-are-not-destiny and free-will-and-moral-responsibility.

War and reconciliation

“Wars never ended because one side was defeated. They ended because the enemies were reconciled. Anything else was just a postponement of the next round of violence.” (source: Clippings/Corey-Tiamats-Wrath.md)

The Expanse’s political arc enacts this claim across nine books: every military victory that doesn’t produce reconciliation produces a successor conflict. See reconciliation-vs-defeat.

Humanity’s duality

“Humanity had come as far as it had in a haze of war, sickness, violence, and genocide. History was drenched in blood. But it also had cooperation and kindness, generosity, intermarriage. The one didn’t come without the other, and Holden had to take comfort in that.” (source: Clippings/Corey-Babylons-Ashes.md)

This mirrors Sapolsky’s careful position in Behave: violence and cooperation are not opposites in human history — they are entangled outputs of the same social machinery. Neither optimistic nor pessimistic readings are adequate. See violence-and-the-long-peace and cooperation-game-theory.

Habits outliving their contexts

“That was the danger of being old and a politician. Habits outlived the situations that created them. Policies remained in place after the situations that inspired them had changed.” (source: Clippings/Corey-Cibola-Burn.md)

A systems argument: institutional behavior persists by inertia even when the environmental conditions that shaped it no longer exist. Pirsig’s factory-rationality point applied to political institutions — attacking the policy doesn’t change the generative structure. See systems-thinking and pirsig-zen-motorcycle.

Graph View

Backlinks